Wayfarers
  • Home
  • Introduction to Free Christianity
  • Thoughts and essays
  • Worship material
  • From the Christian Compass
  • From the Christian Compass 2: On the Creeds
  • Signposts (Blog)
  • Links

Why I don't like what some evangelicals stand for

31/8/2010

0 Comments

 
I recently happened across a review of a conservative evangelical book.  The title etc don't matter; you can read the same sort of thing in many places.  The topic of the book was along the lines of what you need to be if you want to be considered a Christian and it was evidently written so that the 'kids on the street' will get get it.  But that doesn't hide the profoundly unchristian faith behind it.   It prompted me to get this off my chest.

I had a Sunday School teacher (Winchester Methodists, Waltham Forest) who told his class that he wasn't going to marry his girlfriend until she became a Christian because otherwise they wouldn't be together after death (she'd be in Hell).  I was then a fairly pious sort of adolescent and although I don't remember being immediately horrified, I think it acted as a slowly accelerating conveyor-belt propelling me out of association with that sort of conservative evangelical Christianity.  In fact I ended up a fairly militant atheist.  And I  would maintain still that atheism is a more healthy attitude to have.

Paul said love was greater than faith (or hope) but what matters in that sort of evangelical world is Belief.  The criterion upon which you will, or will not, be saved is whether you believe, not whether you've tried to love. 

Does this matter?  Yes. After you've waded through the gluey adjectives that so many conservative evangelicals use - 'amazing', 'awesome', 'wonderful' - it's not the good news of God's love for the world that is offered, except as filtered through a warped blood-sacrifice.  No, the God who offers love is replaced with a God who needs belief. 

It is a weak, inadequate, tetchy God.  A God sullenly sitting by his scales and dropping the weights of the sin he has made for us into the balance against us.  A God who actually doesn't like us very much but has been prevailed upon by His Son to let us into His house rather than wipe us out. 

If God is love, this means that the love we experience in our human relationships must be but a dim reflection (I think Paul used an appposite metaphor here) of that divine love.  The self-forgetting, the self-sacrifice, the forgiveness, the understanding (not to mention the sense of humour) that we show to those we love must be as nothing to that emanating from God.  Yet these people put forward a theology that on examination places God's standard of love significantly below that which we should expect of any parent.

A God of love doesn't get terribly offended and strike us off the invitation list if ignored or even if we don't believe in Him.  Such a God wouldn't expect us to grovel in supplication, or to be singing endless hymns of praise and staring in rapt adoration.

If we ignore God the loss, in terms of this life and the fulfilment that the experience of the divine can bring to it, is surely ours.  God is going to get over it.   No, a God of love is a God of relationship and it is is how we engaged with others that will be the criterion by which we are called to account.
0 Comments

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    What's here

    A quick look at the 'blogosphere' shows that the nature of the medium means it is all too easy for a 'blog' to convey the impression that its compiler is, at best, self-indulgent and verbose, and at worst, a narcissistic bore.  Religious blogs are by no means immune from this.

    However, while I shall try to avoid sharing my each and every passing thought with you, there is a use for a space for shorter, more ephemeral pieces of writing, and on this website, that's here.   These pieces are likely to be frequently revised, sometimes rewritten and occasionally removed.

    ewayfarers@gmail.com

    Archives

    September 2018
    May 2018
    October 2016
    December 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013
    January 2013
    December 2012
    February 2012
    April 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    October 2010
    September 2010
    August 2010

    Categories

    All
    After Life
    Atheism
    Augustine Of Hippo
    Christianity
    Evangelicals
    Forgiveness
    Free Christian
    Fundamentalists
    God
    Heidegger
    Honest To God
    Humanism
    Jesus
    Leon Battista Alberti
    Liberal Christian
    Liberal Evangelicals
    Love
    Mennonites
    Modern Church
    Nature Of Religion
    Neo-liberalism
    Non Prose
    Non-prose
    Prayer
    Russell Lant Carpenter
    Schopenhauer
    Science
    Sources
    Spirituality
    Sydney Carter
    Teresa Of Avila
    Unitarian
    Worship

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.